Friday, January 25, 2013

Emigration from Russia


By the 2/3 point of the 19th century, many emigrants began to seek homes outside Russia and Russian emigration to the United States began in earnest in the 1880s.  Some Russians had made the move to America as early as the 1820s and those numbers had slowly increased through the decades.  In the 1870s more than 35,000 Russians immigrated to the States, but in the succeeding decades, that number increased dramatically.  This chart shows the numbers through the 1930s:

Decade

Number of
Emigrants
1820-1829
86
1830-1839
280
1840-1849
520
1850-1859
423
1860-1869
1670
1870-1879
35177
1880-1889
182698
1890-1899
450101
1900-1909
1501301
1910-1919
1106998
1920-1929
61604
1930-1939
2463

These numbers represent the number of immigrants coming into the United States in the given years who indicated that their last country of residence was Russia.  This does not necessarily mean that the immigrants were ethnic Russians.


Of the emigrants leaving Russia between 1881 and 1914, over 50% were Jewish while only around 2% were native Russian.  Most of the emigrants at this time were seeking improved economic status, while a sizeable number (including the Jewish Russians) were seeking improved religious freedoms.  Many of these emigrants who were not ethnic Russians originated from the southwest areas of the Russian Empire including the provinces of Poland, Volhynia and Podolia and other provinces of the Ukraine.  Those Russian citizens leaving the country after 1920 were largely fleeing the Bolshevik regime and the establishment of the USSR. 


Many of the German Mennonites living in Ostrog and Zaslaw Counties migrated to the United States in the 1870s.  Along with the Mennonites from the Molotschna Colony and other locations in Russia, more than 10,000 Mennonites emigrated in the 1870s – that’s almost a third of all Russians who immigrated to America in that decade.  In some of the Volhynian villages after 1874, Mennonite homes were sold to German Lutherans, and Mennonite churches were converted to Lutheran churches.  After 1874, the majority of the remaining Mennonites in Volhynian Karolswalde area moved to the village of Lisna (Leeleva).  In the succeeding years though, almost all the Mennonites left and Lisna probably became a German Lutheran village.
  


The Helpless Poles, Abe J Unruh, 1973 Montezuma, KS.

Most of the Mennonites who left Volhynia for America in 1874 travelled aboard the following ships:
  • SS Colina, bound for New York via Antwerp, 02 September 1874; carrying Mennonites primarily from Heinrichsdorf.
  • SS London, bound for New York via Liverpool, 18 November 1874; carrying Mennonites primarily from Karolswalde.
  • SS Montreal, bound for New York via Liverpool, 27 November 1874; carrying Mennonites primarily from Karolswalde.
  • SS Nederland, bound for Philadelphia via Antwerp, 28 November 1874; carrying Mennonites primarily from Michalin.
  • SS Vaderland, bound for Philadelphia via Antwerp, 26 December 1874; carrying Mennonites primarily from Antonovka.
  • SS Kenilworth, bound for Philadelphia via Liverpool, 09 January 1875; carrying Mennonites primarily from Karolswalde and Antonovka.
  • SS Illinois, bound for Philadelphia via Liverpool, 28 January 1875; carrying Mennonites primarily from Karolswalde and Antonovka.
  • SS Suevia, bound for New York via Hamburg and Le Havre, 12 November 1875; carrying Mennonites primarily from Karolswalde.

Abe J Unruh


Thursday, January 24, 2013

Ostrog County, Volhynia, Geography


The area occupied by my forefathers in western Ukraine lies at the crossroads of the eastern European regions of Volhynia (Ukr: Volyn, Воли́нь; Russian: Volyn, Волы́нь; Polish: Wołyń; German: Wohynien), Podolia, and Galicia.  Volhynia (to the northeast), Podolia (to the south) and Galicia (to the southwest) meet near Teofipol, about 30 miles due south from Antonivka.  The area is bordered by Poland to the west and north, Belorus (White Russia) and Ukraine (Ruthenia) to the north and east, Moldava and Bessarabia to the south and Hungary to the west.  In the 19th century, not only was the area inhabited by native Volhynians, Podolians, and Galicians (these 3 nationalities being Ukrainians), but also by Russians, Poles, Bessarabians and Moldavans (Romanians).  Germans, Czechs and Swiss later formed colonies in the area as well.  Muslim Tatars inhabited some areas, leftover from the days of conquest of the Mongols and Turks.  Furthermore, the area sat right in the middle of the Pale of Settlement providing areas of inhabitation to the Jewish peoples of Russia.  Finally, occasional Rom (Gypsy) camps also occupied the countryside and the occasional Finn, Latvian, Lithuanian or Frenchman could also be found.



Geographically, the northern areas of this region are part of the Polesia (Ukr: Polissya, Полі́сся) lowlands, an area of northern Ukraine/southern Belorus including the Pripyat (При́п'ять) River marshes which is characterized by large expanses of swamps, with many marshes and streams.  This swampy area generally extends from a line north of Lusk-Rovno-Zhytomyr-Kiev.  South of this line the Volhynian Uplands rise and the landscape gains many hills and becomes generally much dryer.  South of the Volhynian Uplands are the Podolian Uplands.  With the Podolian Uplands, the area becomes almost mountainous as far south as Kremenets, as the ground gives rise to the Outer Eastern Carpathian foothills.  Grassy flatlands, steppe or prairie-lands are not to be found in this region that is covered with large expanses of forest.  The majority of the trees are pine and oak, with spruce, beech, birch and locust also forming a percentage of the forest.  Animals found in the area are similar to those found in any wooded region of Europe; deer, boar, marten, beaver, muskrat, hare, fox, and even an occasional wolf, as well as pheasant, quail, ducks and cranes, make their homes here.  The forest at the end of the 20th century still covers a wide expanse of land; creating an almost unbroken chain of woods 75 miles long and 10 to 15 miles wide through the heart of Volhynia. 

The main river (річка) in the area is the Gorin (Ukr: Гори́нь; Rus: Горы́нь, Horyn; Pol: Horyń; German: Horyn; Yiddish: Horin, האָרין), itself a tributary of the Pripyat, whose headwaters lie in the hills south of the city of Kremenets and which flows in a northerly direction through Iziaslaw (Zaslaw) and Slavuta, westwards towards Ostrog and then sharply to the north and on past Rovno.  The Gorin joins the Pripyat in southern Belorus.  The Pripyat-Gorin system forms one of the most westerly of the river systems comprising the Dneipr River basin (Басейн Дніпра) which covers most of Ukraine and Belorus. 

Tributaries of the Gorin which flow through the area include the Vilia (Ukr: Ві́лія, Russ: Вилия;), which flows in a northeasterly direction from its source near Pidlisne (Ukr: Підлі́сне) and joins the Gorin just to the west of the town of Ostrog and the Zbytynka (Ukr: Збитинка) which flows easterly from its origin east of Dubno, and joins the Gorin at Mezhyrich.  A little farther south, the Huscisko (Riska) flows in a northerly direction from its headwaters south of Husk until it joins the Vilia at Kamenka.  The Zluzie is formed near Pluznoe and flows in a northerly direction to join the Huscisko near Martynie.  In the 19th Century, before the Khmelnitsky nuclear power plant cooling reservoir was built, the Gnili Rig (Rotten Horn), (Ukr: Гнили́й Ріг, Czarna; Pol: Gnily Row) flowed in a northerly direction through the forest to join the Gorin to the northeast of Ostrog, from it’s headwaters near Markzec (Mokrets), but it no longer exists today.  Many marshy, swampy areas surround these tributaries, just as they do the Gorin and the Pripyat.




Soviet Collectivization and the Eviction of the Kulaks


After the Bolshevik Revolution, the communists began to single out specific societal groups known as the kulaks (кулакс).  Kulaks, although ill-defined, were considered enemies of the Bolshevik Revolution and of the Soviet State.  Generally speaking, the kulaks were the landowing class of the Russian countryside.  The Bolsheviks painted the picture that the kulaks stood in the way of the socialist utopia they would create.  Generally, collectivization took away land and possessions from the kulaks.

The kulak (кулак) “class” consisted of land-owners who were of foreign nationality or who became landed after the Stolypin agrarian reforms of 1906.  The Stolypin reforms dissolved peasant communes, bought land from nobles, and divided the land among peasants, creating “land-owning” peasant class – the muzhiks (мужчин).  These muzhiks received small parcels of land from the government, on a mortgage type system – it was intended that they would have to pay for the land.  Muzhiks were those who were serfs before 1861 and became free peasants after the emancipation.  These kulaks generally supported the Whites in the Russian Civil War.  The kulaks understood that the Bolsheviks would probably take away their land if they won the civil war.  In the 1920s the civil war (the war, creating the first wave of inefficient collectivization) created famine in Russia and Lenin began to confiscate grain from peasants.  Anyone accused of being a kulak had his grain taken, as well as his seed-grain.  Kulaks were doomed.  After the civil war, the Bolsheviks considered only the poorer classes of landless peasants as allies.  During the period after the civial was, the Soviets official defined the kulak class as: 1) those who hired others for labor, 2) owners of mills, creamerys, or other processing equipment with a mechanical motor, 3) those who rented out agricultural machinery or facilities, 4) those who were involved in trade, money-lending or commercial brokerage (i.e., anyone who sold a surplus for money).  Bolshevik revolutionary thinker, Grigory Zinoviev, once said that a kulak was any peasant who had enough to eat.

Stalin continued collectivization and used the kulaks as scapegoats for ineffective practices.  Offical policy of 1930 approved extermination of kulaksKulaks began to be transported to Siberia or Kazakhstan.  Many were simply dropped off in the middle of nowhere without supplies, food or shelter.  Others were forced to work their farms, but not allowed to keep any of its production.  4 to 8 million kulaks died.  Many kulaks didn’t even know what crimes against the state they may have committed.  Even ex-kulaks weren’t safe.  But the Soviet machine saw them as obstacles to the collectivization process; the real heart and soul of communism in the countryside.

Collectivation, however, was such a failure that shortages of food continued to occur into the 1980s.  The Russian Army was forced to help farmers till the land at periods between the 1930s and the 1980s.  By the mid-1980s, the Reagan administration ramped up military spending in the US that the USSR had to try to match.  Money that should have gone to propping up the Soviet economy had to be put towards the military. The US’ victory in the Cold War was in part due to economic shortages in the USSR caused by collectivization and the liquidation of the kulaks.  Economic shortages that could have been averted had the kulak class been allowed to keep their land and help produce food to feed the countryside.  Kulaks became the missing link in the economic chain that brought the USSR to its ruin.



The Soviet Bolsheviks continued to press their authority over the countryside, however, and Joseph Stalin’s NKVD (The People's Commissariat of Internal Affairs; the Soviet administrative body used to fight crime and maintain public order)  roamed the country rounding up kulaks and setting the groundwork for collectivization.  Exorbitant taxes were levied.  Kulaks by the hundreds and thousands were seized and exiled deep into Soviet controlled Siberia.  Many Germans and Poles were taken from Volhynia too, and the Counties of Ostrog and Zaslaw suffered as well.  Churches were closed and schools were consolidated.  Villagers were forced to give up their traditional languages and customs.  The numbers of Polish and German kulaks exiled from the villages in the neighborhood of the Volhynian Mennonite villages in the 1930s was thus:

  • Borisov: 12 families
  • Choten II: 150 families
  • Kunev:10 families
  • Dorohosch: 35 families
  • Old Husk: 30 families
  • New Husk: 20 families
  • Kamenka: 48 families
  • Kustarna: 21 families
  • Lisna (Leeleva): 30 families
  • Martynie: 9 families
  • Michailivka: 25 families
  • Little Radohosch: 30 families
  • Siever: 16 families
  • Stanislavka: 11 families
  • Storonich: 27 families


A firsthand account of a Polish kulak family exiled from the nearby village of Belotin can be found here:

Stalin’s collectivization policies fundamentally changed the countryside.  The villages in Ostrog and Zaslaw counties, as well as the other Volhynian Counties and Russian provinces, were formed into collectives.

Directly affecting the Karolswalde villages, the Russian Civil War was followed by the Polish-Soviet War, after which the victorious Poles took control of the northwestern half of Volhynia; cutting Ostrog County right in half.  Ostrog then fell under Polish control and the Soviet-Polish border lay along the Vilia River, passing directly through the village of Karolswalde, which was then named Prikordonnoe (Russian: Прикордонное; Ukrainian: Prykordonne, Прикордо́нне), after the Ukrainian adjective for ‘border’ (прикордонний).  During this time, the administrative center of the Polish half of Ostrog County was moved to Zdolbunow.  The southern half of Ostrog County, under Soviet control, was consolidated into Zaslaw County. 

Wednesday, January 23, 2013

Transportation and Communication in 19th Century Volhynia


Communication and transportation services increased in Volhynian Russia, as they did across the globe during the 19th Century.  By the late 18th Century, few Ukrainian roads were paved and most were impassable during spring and autumn.  No fencing or drainage existed either.  Serfs and fee-farmers were given the duty of maintaining these roads.  Roads tended to run from town to town rather than in a straight line, making travel a very roundabout proposition.  Government officials or magnates might have coaches regularly travelling between localities and free-men could purchase a fare on these coaches for an extremely high cost.  Many roads were marked by verst-posts; 10 foot high posts which roughly marked the route through the countryside.  But otherwise no structures contributed to the roadways which were basically just tracks roughly following the verst-posts.  Even important routes, such as the Moscow-Odessa highway, was little more than vague impression upon the land by the 1850s.  Military personnel travelling along roads in the Empire had the authority to appropriate horses or carriages leaving the original owner on foot.  Perhaps the most common type of passenger carriage in the Ukrianian and Russian countryside at this time was the tarantasse.

During the reign of Katherine II Вели́ка (the Great) (1762-1796), dedicated postmen (called a yamstchik [ямщик]) began to deliver mail along the roads of the Empire.  Dressed in red with a white belt, blowing a horn to signal his advance, the yamstchik drove carts pulled by 6 horses in the summer and sledges pulled by 4 horses in the winter, horses were generally hitched abreast to one another.  The Tsar issued legislation in the late 18th century decreeing that any municipality where it was proper should erect facilities to house horses for postal use and a special mail house for use as a post office.  Early post centers in Volhynia were Novograd Volyn and Zhytomyr.  Postmen had the right to bear arms in the support and protection of mail and cargo.  By the 1830s, rates had been put into place for the handling of personal mail and mailboxes for outgoing mail started to appear in provincial towns along busy streets or in big stores.  In 1858 Russia introduced the postage stamp along with corresponding postmarks.  Different classifications of stamps were available as were postcards.  Postcards with landscape or photography prints became popular by the 1870s and several postcard photographers began to specialize in this craft.  Advertising via postcards became popular as well.

Postal stations were built beginning in 1846 and stations were built in one of seven classes, depending on the location of the station.  Zhytomyr and Novograd Volhyn both had class 2 stations.  In the mid 19th century, postal stations were to be equipped with desks, benches and chairs, ink, paper and pens, kerosene lanterns, as well as living quarters for the postal supervisor and a supply of wood for the station’s heating, but many were nothing more than rude log huts.  By the mid-19th century, mail delivery may have been somewhat erratic, but probably arrived in provincial cities 3 or 4 times per week.  Stations housed up to 20 horses.  Postal wagons were forbidden to carry passengers, but oftentimes did anyway. 

Freight delivery, particularly crop freight, was delivered primarily via water – on the rivers of the area – until the early 20th century.  Waterways supplied revenue to cities by way of government-owned ferries.  This revenue was significantly reduced after bridges were built.  Neteshin, part of the Krivin Estate in the 19th Century, was the area’s major port on the Goryn River.

During the first 50 years of the 19th century, the Brest-Litovsk highway was being built.  From 1856-1865, telegraph lines were put in place along the highway with stations at Kyiv, Novograd-Volyn, Ostrog, Dubno and Brody.  A secondary highway ran through the forest from Ostrog to Zaslaw via Bilotin.  This highway had been established before the 19th century.

Stagecoaches began to run on the highway providing public transportation by the late 19th Century.  Coach travel was very expensive, but coaches were built that could hold up to 40 passengers.  The price of fare between Zhytomyr and Novograd Volyn was 5 or 6 rubles – equal to the value of a young heifer.  Poor passengers could ride on the roof but then suffered from bad weather.  Speed of the coaches was in the neighborhood of 8 – 10 miles per hour.  More speed would have not been desirable as the typical carriage had no springs and the roadway could be expected to be in deplorable condition.

A German-Polish Baptist minister, travelling in the vicinity of Sorotschin in the early 1860s, found that traversing the Volhynian countryside could be quite challenging.  Passage by horse and wagon was severly impeded by the poor condition of the roads, thick forests and deep swamps.  Sorotschin was located in the heavily German populated triangular area between Zhytomyr, Novograd-Volyn and Korosten, which included land in Zhytomyr, Novograd-Volyn and Ovruchs Counties.

In April of 1912, bus service opened between Zhytomyr and Novograd Volyn.  The price was less than 2 rubles and the 45 mile trip lasted about 6 hours.  By 1911, rules of the road had been established for motor vehicle traffic including speed limits.  A bus-route between Novograd Volyn and Rivne was established soon afterwards.

Railways began to expand by the second half of the 19th Century.  Lines began by connecting St. Petersburg to Moscow and to Warsaw and then gradually expanded from there.  Rail transport in Volhynia grew as the rail line was established in the 1870s.  Train travel was encumbered, however, by the amount of paperwork involved to acquire a ticket and by the long wait times at stations.  2nd class carriages carried about 50 people, and had seats on either side of the car with an aisle down the middle through which the conductor or passengers might pass.  1st class carriages were rarely used.  The Russian guage, it should be noted, did not match that of other European countries during this period of time. 

Telegraph lines began to appear in the 1850s and telegrams could be sent in French, German or Russian.  International convention caused these lines to be placed across borders with Prussia and Austria.  Locals developed the habit of placing their ears to these lines, endevouring to overhear conversations.  Who else could be speaking on these lines but kings?  Telephone service began in the early 1910s, but telephone and telegraph service development were severely impaired by WWI. 




According to an all-Volhynian calendar/almanac published in Zhytomyr in 1892, Postal stations in Ostrog County were located in Ostrog, Gochsha (Гоща), Korets (Корецъ), and Jampol (Ямполь).  Postal stations in Zaslaw County were located in Zaslaw, Shepetovka (Шепетовка), and Polonnoe (Полонное).  These locations also housed telegraph offices in 1892.



Tuesday, January 22, 2013

Ethnic Minority Groups in 19th Century Ostrog and Zaslaw Counties


The native inhabitants of Volhynia included Poles, Ukrainians (Volhynians, Podolians and Galicians), as well as some White Russians (Byelorussians) and even some proper (Red) Russians (Ukr: росіяни).  In 1795 with the Third Partition of Poland, local Volhynian noblemen began to offer land to German (Ukr: німці) settlers in the hopes that the German farmers could convert the swampy forest-land into productive farmland.  Among the German settlers who accepted such proposals were Mennonites from German Prussia and Brandenburg, including my Ratzlaff ancestors belonging to the Przechowka and Neumark congregations.  And by the very early 1800s, my Great Great Great Grandfather, Heinrich Ratzlaff, was living in the village of Karolswalde, which lay about three miles south-southwest of Ostrog.


By the late 18th Century, Prussian Mennonites began to seek new homes.  Their Prussian homelands, where they had previously enjoyed a measure of autonomy and freedom from the armed forces, were becoming increasingly a military state with the rise of Ducal Prussia.  Furthermore, the Mennonites’ ability to purchase new tracts of land had been severely limited by laws put in place by the Prussian government.  The agrarian Mennonites, theologically committed to non-violence, were not allowed to purchase additional land without serving in the military or paying exorbitant taxes in lieu of such service.  Additional farmland was a necessity for such an agricultural based culture.  Therefore, the Mennonites in West Prussia, including those belonging to the Przechowka Congregation, as well as those in the Neumark area of Brandenburg, had no choice but to seek new homes outside the boundaries of the various German states.  Many of the members of Przechowka accepted invitations from the Russian Government to accept military and tax exemptions and settle far away in South Russia; an area Russia had recently seized from the Ottoman Empire.  Many members of the Neumark congregations, though, accepted offers from Volhynian noblemen which conversely did not include such advantageous taxation or military benefits, but which lie much closer to their homelands in German Prussia and Brandenburg and where the countryside more closely resembled that of which they were accustomed.  Indeed, Volhynia had been part of “civilized” Europe for centuries whereas the steppe of southeastern Ukraine must have been the Wild, Wild West.  Only very recently had the area been seized from Ottoman Turkey and wild tribes of nomadic Tatars still roamed and hunted the vast, untamed plains.



A second wave of foreigners came into Ukraine after 1861 after the emancipation of the Russian serfs.  Previously, serfs in Russia and Ukraine were tied to the land as in a medieval feudal system.  The Russian or Ukrainian landowners could do as they would with their serfs in return for keeping the serfs housed, clothed, etc.  After 1861, serfs were freed by the Russian government and were no longer tied to the land.  Serfs were given the option of buying land from the state.  As a result, many serfs moved off the estates owned by the landholding elite, leaving a shortage of labor.  The Russian and Ukrainian landowners at this time invited German and other European farmers onto their estates to work their land.

Mennonites weren’t the only Germans moving into the area; German Lutherans entered Ukraine in the early 19th century as well.  Lutheranism had been well-established in Russia since the days of Peter the Great and Lutheranism was one of only two religions officially accepted by the Russian Government (Russian Orthodoxy being the other).  German (Prussian) Lutherans moved into Russia in the early 1800s as they too were offered attractive invitations by the Tsar and saw economic opportunities in Russian Ukraine.  By the mid 19th Century, the majority of German settlers in Volhynia were Lutherans.  Indeed, in 1862 there were no fewer than 45 Lutheran German villages in Volhynia.  There were also German Baptists in the Volhynia area. The Lutherans and Baptists were primarily in areas directly north of Zhytomyr and Novograd-Volyn, as well as in Kovel County.   By the mid-1800s, German Baptists were moving into the area, drawn by religious persecution in Germany and the availability of land in Ukraine.  By the late 1800s, some Lutherans had begun converting to become Baptists.

Zaslaw and Ostrog counties were populated largely by 6 cultural groups: Ukrainians, Jews, Poles, Russians, Germans and Czechs.  Muslims and Gypsies also constituted a very small percentage of the populace.  This information comes from the 1897 census of the Russian Empire.  If you're feeling confident in reading Russian, you can find many more details regarding this census here.


The largest ethnic group was the native Ukrainian population which formed around 80% of the population and largely adhered to the Ukrainian Orthodox Church.  My German Mennonite ancestors probably generally confused these folks for Russians, but there were actually very few Russian in the area.  The Russians who were in the area were generally despised as foreign overlords perhaps not unlike how the English are viewed in Northern Ireland today.

The next largest ethnic group was the Jewish population.  Jewish peoples had lived in this area since ancient times, but became a larger percentage of the population after the formation of the Pale of Settlement.  The Jews settled especially in urban areas like Zaslaw, Ostrog or Slavuta, but also in Cuniv, Belotin, and Pluznoe.  Jews largely engaged in commerce and trade and had considerable economic and political influence.  Although they suffered as second-class citizens according to Russian laws, they became the most affluent cultural group in the towns as they owned businesses and controlled trade.  Jews owned print shops in Zaslaw and Ostrog, as well as warehouses, bakeries, mills and shops across the area.  In time, Jews also became leaders in the region regarding trade unions, health care facilities and credit unions.  At the time of the Bolshevik Revolution, Jews largely sided with the communists.  As a result, Jews were held in contempt by most of the other cultural groups and were not to be trusted.  The native Ukrainians attempted to gain independence after the revolution and the Jews who sided with the Bolsheviks were despised as a result.

The next largest ethnic group was the Poles.  Of course, the region in question was under Polish control for long periods of time, so these Poles were well established.  Dorohosch, Borisov, Kamenka, Stanislavka, Storonich, Balyary, old and new Husk, small Radohosch and Siever all had Polish majorities.  Several other towns such as Dertka, Cuniv and Martynie also had large Polish populations.  These Poles tended to be Catholics or Uniates.  Many of them engaged in agriculture, growing millet or barley, but the soil of the area did not provide viable farmland.  Some also engaged in horticulture, tending cherry, plum, apple or pear trees.  Fresh and dried fruits were taken to be sold at the markets in Slavuta or Zaslaw.  Since the land was not ideal for farming, however, the majority of Poles tended to work at various crafts, many of which were based on raw materials provided by the forest.  The Poles made barrels, wheels, and sledges and produced charcoal from oak wood from the forest.  The village of Kaminka was inhabited by Poles who produced stonework from the native sandstone.  Many others, such as those in Dorohosch, became expert blacksmiths.

German colonies began to appear in the late 18th century and the Germans added new skills to the region.  Most of the Germans in the Ostrog and Zaslaw Counties were Mennonite, but elsewhere they were Lutherans or Baptists.  The Germans settled in the villages of Karolswalde, Antonivka, Lesna (Leeleva) and Michailivka, but also lived in the minority in Pluznoe and Zaslaw.  The Germans had a better understanding of agriculture and did have more success than other groups at tilling the soil.  The Germans produced crops like potatoes and corn with at least some level of success.  The Germans also produced dairy products; especially milk which was often-times transported to Slavuta to be made into butter.  Finally, the Germans also engaged in handicrafts, and excelled in smithing and the manufacture of agricultural implements.  Germans, unlike the other cultural groups, made the schooling of their children mandatory from an early date, regardless of gender or land-holding status.

Czech colonists became established by the second half of the 19th century, and largely populated the villages of Antonivka and Jadwanin.  Czechs also lived in the minority in Lesna, Michailivka and Stanislavka, Karlswald, Martynie, Dorohosch and Bilotyn.  Czechs found the availability of inexpensive land in Volhynia appealing, especially after worsening relations with their ethnic German overlords in Austria-Hungary.  The Czechs and other Slavic groups in Austria were a limited minority group.  The limitations placed upon them by the Austrian (German) rulers helped spark WWI by the second decade of the 20th Century.  Czechs largely engaged in agriculture, animal husbandry and forest industries.  Other Czechs excelled at weaving.  Finally, Czechs were known to erect the best water and steam mills. 

A special note should be made of the Muslim Tatars who lived in the area in Yuvkitski as well as on the northern outskirts of Ostrog.  These Muslims were descended from the Mongol hordes which invaded the area in the 1240s and were overlords of medieval Russia, Chernigov and Kiev.  Muslims prevailed in southern areas and continued to raid into European Russia and Ukraine into the 16th century from their capitals in Sarai on the Volga and the Crimea.  Mennonites in the Molotschna Colony in South Russia also lived side by side with Mongol descendants; the feared Nogai tribesmen who occasionally raided Mennonite herds on the south Ukrainian steppes.  The Volhynian Tatars were probably more tame, however, as the topography of the land required the Tatars to give up their nomadic ways, unlike their south Ukrainian brethren.


The final significant ethnic group in the area was the Russians.  The Russians gained control of Volhynia/Ukraine via the partitions of Poland and began to increase in number throughout the 19th century.  Russians established the seat of Russian Orthodoxy for the area in Zaslaw.  Zaslaw also housed offices for government officials and barracks for a military garrison, both of which were populated chiefly by Russians.  Early in the 20th Century, a military garrison was also built in Cunev.  Members of the government administration, as well as of the police force, were largely Russians in the 19th Century.  From the turn of the 20th Century, all official documentation in Ukraine was done in the Russian language.  Russians lived chiefly in the towns where administration was housed, Zaslaw, Ostrog and Slavuta, although smaller offices in towns like Pluznoe or Cuniv meant these smaller towns also held a small Russian populace.  Russian presence in smaller villages was non-existent.  There were, however, a very small number of Russian “Old Believers” living in the Ostrog and Kuniv forests.

Towns and villages each had their own houses of worship.  Those towns with multiple ethnic groups might have had Orthodox as well as Catholic churches.  Towns with larger Jewish populations would, of course, have a synagogue.  Oftentimes, cemetaries were segregated by religion or the different religions would maintain separate cemetaries altogether.

In the 19th Century, all these different groups of nationalities contributed to Russia’s stunted economic, social and industrial growth.  In the 18th Century, as Germans or Czechs were invited to move into the Russian Empire, they were allowed to keep their own languages, conduct their own schools, and even administer their own villages.  Some were exempt from military service and all seemed to become more affluent than the native Ukrainians and the Russian overlords.  As unrest grew in Russia during the 19th Century, the Russian government became obligated to remove some of the rights enjoyed by these national groups in an attempt to unify the populace.  For instance, having Germans living across the countryside, administering their own schools and villages, speaking their own language and owing little to the State except taxes, did nothing to contribute to a unified society and only stirred unrest.  As the Russian government saw what damage was being done, it began to remove these special privileges and rights from these minority groups.  For instance, Germans were no longer allowed to administer their own villages and Russian teachers were installed to teach the children, and to carry out the education in the Russian language.  This process was called Russification and was an important part of Russia’s domestic policy by the second half of the 19th Century.

Russification turned out to be too little too late, however.  In addition to other shortcomings, Russification only served to further disillusion the populace and revolutionary ferver by the turn of the century was ripe.  The Russian Revolution unseated the Tsar and by the 1920s, the minority groups were suffering heavily under the new Bolshevik regime.  In Ukraine, a large percentage of the so-called Kulaks, the wealthy middle class, were Germans, Poles and Czechs.  Many of these peoples fled over the borders into Poland when they had their chances after the war with Poland in 1921.


In the 19th Century, there were a couple dozen villages in the area, in addition to the larger towns of Ostrog and Zaslaw.  Many of these villages were inhabited strictly by one cultural group or another, each group establishing its own church and cemeteries and clinging to its own native language and customs.  Since this was a border area, researching these villages today can be confusing as many different spellings for the towns and villages exist.  For instance, the village that in today’s Ukraine is spelled Pluznoe (Плу́жне), was spelled Pluzhnoe (Плужное) under Russia/Soviet rule, Płużne under Polish rule and was known as Plushnoje by the nearby Germans.  Further, it would have had an altogether different name in the Jewish language of Yiddish.  Many difficulties arise in keeping all the transliterations straight.

Monday, January 21, 2013

Menno Township, Marion County, Kansas

Initially when the Andreas Ratzlaff family settled in Kansas, they rented a farm in the southeast corner of Section 24, Menno Township, Marion County, Kansas.  The lived on this farm until 1914.  During this period of time, the Ratzlaff children attended Steinbach School which was located at the extreme northeast corner of Section 23.  After 1914, the family moved one mile south, and lived on a farm at the southeast corner of Section 25.  At this time, the children had to move schools and attend the Antioch School, located at the northwest corner of Section 36.  My Grandfather, Albert Ratzlaff, was just a little guy when attending Steinbach, but went to Antioch for most of his childhood years, through 8th Grade.  I remember driving down the road with Grandpa when I was young, past the site of the school where there was still a hedgerow that had bordered the schoolyard.  I remember how Grandpa pointed out that many a baseball was lost in that hedgerow when he was a schoolboy.  My dad, Norman Ratzlaff, also attended the Antioch School in the early 1940s for elementary school.  When they were grown and struck out on their own, three of the Ratzlaff boys acquired land along the road running between Sections 24 and 25 that would later become a blacktop.  Albert's farm was located in the northeast quarter of Section 25, Jacob's in the southeast quarter of Section 23, and Abraham in the southeast quarter of Section 22.


Wednesday, January 16, 2013

Social Divisions in Imperial Russia


Russian society was strictly divided into social classes or estates (sosloviia, cословия), separating one social group from another.  Like other European societies, this soslovie (сословие) system had existed from medieval times.  As in other European countries in the 19th Century, four basic sosloviia existed: 1) nobility, 2) clergy, 3) urban commoners, and 4) rural peasants.  The hierarchical system began at the top with the tsar and continued down to the lowest peasant.  The system had religious foundations; the tsar was given his position by god and the hierarchy was seen as established by god as well.  People felt secure knowing they had a place within society.  Raznochinet  (разночинца) was the term given to those who fell between the nobility/clergy and the peasantry (the growing middle class).  Nobility consisted of hereditary and personal nobility.  Divisions existed in the clerical class depending upon the clergyman’s specific role in his church.  Commoners were divided into many groups including honorable citizens, urban commoners, merchants, philistines, and burghers.  A special soslovie was the military.  Cossacks and other military men held their own sosloviia.

The peasant class was the largest class of all and included numerous different ranks.  Peasants were different from other classes in that they were subject to both a poll tax (Подушный оклад) and military conscription whereas members of other classes may not have been.  Single homesteaders, farmers, monastic farmers, free agriculturalists, state peasants, landowners’ peasants, appanage peasants, and ascribed peasants were all different classes among the peasantry (Крестьяне).  Some German settlers were categorized as free agriculturalists (Вольные хлебопашцы), while others identified themselves as Крестьянин, a variation on the Russian for peasant.

Each soslovie had different rights and obligations; some were subject to certain kinds of taxation, some were subject to military conscription, some were required to belong to guilds, each was required to hold different types of passports, etc.  Some classifications were allowed to travel freely while others were restricted.  Some groups were able to engage in commerce, although limitations may exist upon the characteristics of such.  Some groups were entitled to a certain degree of mobility and might change classification depending upon employment tenure, net wealth or marriage status.  Members of a soslovie might petition the tsar to modify their rights or privileges.  Thus, two sosloviia that may have been otherwise almost identical may have been subject to dissimiliar entitlements or restrictions.

Most European countries similarly classified their populations and this system provided their populace with social identity and clearly defined the peoples’ role within society.  One’s social status not only determined how he paid taxes or became employed, but it also affected his day to day life with very tangible measures.  A member of a peasant class would need to address higher class folks with a certain title and they may need to give way in traffic or don their cap when approached.  Certain classes would not have been able to legally possess arms of any sort, or achieve master status within their vocation, or would need to quit their education after achieving a certain level.  From the American standpoint, this system seems very restrictive and even inhumane, but these systems existed in European societies for centuries.

In his Russian passport (pasportnaya kniga), Andreas Ratzlaff identified Крестьянин as the soslovie to which he belonged.



-Across the Revolutionary Divide: Russia and the USSR 1861-1945, Theodore R Weeks, Wiley-Blackwell, 2010.  Chapter 2


Tuesday, January 15, 2013

Metrical Books and Passports in 19th Century Russia


In 19th Century Russia, citizens were recorded for a variety of purposes.  Certifying identity provided the government with citizenship records providing data to tabulate taxes, to provide lists for military conscription, to record social estate status, to record land ownership, or to preserve hereditary information.  Citizenship records were kept in two ways: 1) metrical books recorded by the clergy, and 2) internal passports purchased by the citizen from the local police.

Metrical Books (Metrika) first appeared under Peter the Great as a tool for cataloging the population of the Russian Empire.  Beginning in the early 1700s, the government required that clergy keep the metrical books, starting with the Russian Orthodox Christians.  Gradually, the requirement spread to other religions in the Empire including Protestant Christian, Roman Catholic, Islam and Judaism.  However, Buddhists in the east and the recognized pagans in European Russia, escaped registration in metrical books entirely.  The books created the fundamental register of identity in the Empire and served as the basis for civil status.  Regardless of social station or religion, citizens were required to report to clergy to have recorded births, marriages and deaths.  The records created the official documentation needed to identify birthdates, social and civil rights of an individual, and provided lists from which were drawn tax registers and military draft notices.

The government issued instructions to clergy that metrical books were serious records and their maintenance was of utmost importance.  Yearly, parish clergy submitted their metrical records to local government authorities.  This inclusion of the clergy into such vital record-keeping shows that the Empire’s government was indeed moored to religious foundations.  However, suspicions arose from time to time that certain clergy were not fastidious enough in their record keeping which the government may have evaluated as sabotage or treason.  Catholics, Jews and Muslims were from time to time put down as being poor record keepers.  Obviously there were many problems with this system; Lutherans wanted to keep their records in German, and Tatar Muslims in their native languages, etc.  What was to be done if a citizen converted to a different religion or confessed to no religion at all?  What if a new religion was formed?  Metrical books lasted until the Tsarist government was put down by the Bolsheviks and the process was never taken over by civic authorities.

-“Between Particularism and Universalism: Metrical Books and Civil Status in the Russian Empire, 1800-1914”, Paul W. Werth, UNLV.


Passports (pasportnaya kniga): internal passports had been in place in Russia since the early 18th Century as Peter the Great instituted their use as a way to certify a person’s legal place of residence.  Internal passports, identifying the bearer by occupation, residence, and estate, helped regulate travel and prevented evasion of taxes and military conscription.  Passports held by those belonging to lower social orders were registered by the local administrative institutions or rural societies and bound the holder to his residence and form of employment; the passport illustrated that a person belonged in a particular place and to a particular vocation.  By the late 19th Century, members of lower social orders received passports that were valid for five years, after which time the bearer was required to renew the document.  Each social estate had its own local administrative body.  All members of lower social estates were held responsible for the collective burden of taxes levied on their social estate.  The administrative body certified that an individual had paid his taxes and was eligible for a passport.  Yearly fees were also paid on the passport as a sort of tax on free movement.  Local administrative bodies could also place limitations on a person’s free travel rights.  Literate passport holders, usually members of higher estates, signed their document while the lower orders made their mark or recorded their physical description.  Members of higher estates received passports which were less restrictive.

-Documenting Individual Identity, Jane Caplan and John Torpey ed, Princeton 2001.  Chapter 4, pp 67-80.

Andreas Ratzlaff’s passport is an example of a pasportnaya kniga.


Tuesday, January 8, 2013

19th Century Volhynian administration


After being totally absorbed by the Russian Empire as a result of the 3 Partitions of Poland during the late 18th Century, Volhynia (Volyn Guberniya - Волинська Губернія) was divided into counties (powiati - повітів or okruga - округов) by the Tsar’s government.  Each powiat (повіт) had an administrative center or county town (Губернскаго городовъ or Повітовий центр) which was the namesake for the powiat.  Immediately after the establishment of the province within the Russian government, the Volhynian capital was Zaslaw (Iziaslav).  It was soon moved to Novograd Volyn, and soon moved again to Zhytomyr, where it remained for the duration of the 19th Century.

This map (from Wikipedia) shows the 12 Volhynian Powiati during the 19th Century, listed alphabetically according to the Russian alphabet.  Ostrog Powiat is number 10:


This accompanying chart shows some statistical data for the 12 Volhynian Powiati, c.1897:


Each powiat was divided into parishes or townships (volosti - волостей).  Powiati had between 16 and 25 volosti.  Each volost (волость) had its administrative center located in an important village and each parish took its name from this village.  The Mennonite villages of Karlswalde, Antonovka, Leeleva and the rest, fell administratively into Ostrog Powiat (Powiat Ostrozhsky – Острозький Повіт).  Antonovka was in Kunivska Volost (Волость Кунівська) with its center at Kuniv, and Leeleva was in Pluzhanska Volost (Волость Плужанська) with its center at Pluzhno.

This chart shows some further information regarding Powiat Ostrozhsky, c.1897:


For an excellent map of 19th Century Volhynia, look here.


Information is taken from the 1897 Russian census:

and the 1890 edition of the Brokgauz and Efron Encyclopedic Dictionary

Monday, January 7, 2013

Volhynian Railway Service


Railways began to be established in Russia in the 19th Century and the rail line was built through Volhynia in the 1870s.  By the early 1890s, the Ukrainian Kiev-Brest line formed the main line through Volhynia, running roughly northwest-southeast, serving Volhynian towns in between Kovel to Berdichev (Berdichev was part of Volhynia until 1855, after which point it was moved into the Kiev Province for administrative purposes).  A spur ran from Zdolbunov (just south of Rovno) to Radziwill (Radziwilow).  The Russians established the railway lines with little regard for local municipalities; lines primarily led to Russian cities or destinations and bypassed many important Ukrainian locations.  For instance, of the 12 Volhynian cities that were administrative centers for the 12 Volhynian counties, only one (Kovel) was directly served by the railway.  Furthermore, no direct railway link led between Kiev and Odessa, the two most important Ukrainian cities (no direct highway link existed either!).  From Ostrog, a person would have needed to travel to Krivin, Wilbowno, Ozenin or Zdolbunov to catch a train.  

This map shows the route in 1882.  East from Kiev, a person could continue travelling to Kursk, where connections could lead either to Kharkov or Moscow.  West from Kovel led to Lublin (Poland) or Brest, in the province of Grodno.  A connection at Brest could also take a person to Moscow.  Brest, along with Lemberg (L’vov) in Austrian Galicia, were the two most important rail hubs near the western Ukrainian frontier.


From an 1891 Volhynian calendar/almanac published by a company in Zhytomyr, we find the local railway table.  Prices are given in rubles/kopecks and distances are given in versts (1 verst was about the equivalent of 2/3rds of a mile).


With the current information, I don't know the railway schedule for this line.  A similar publication (Volhynian calendar/almanac) published in 1906 indicates that there were 6 trains per day passing between Zhytomyr and Berdichev in that year.  Zhytomyr and Berdichev were easily the largest cities in the area in the early years of the 20th Century, so it makes sense that train traffic would be busy between those locations.  Out in the countryside trains probably didn't pass with as much frequency, but rail travel was the fastest, most efficient way to travel over land in those days.




Wednesday, January 2, 2013

Andreas and Susanna (Wedel) Ratzlaff photo

This is a photo of Andreas and Susanna (Wedel) Ratzlaff, taken in Lehigh, KS, in 1922 when Andreas was 53 and Susanna was 49.  I'm unsure of the history of the photo, but it may have been taken by my grandfather, Albert Ratzlaff.


This is the only photo I have of Andreas and Susanna.  If anyone out there has any other photos, please let me know.