Sunday, March 24, 2013

Village, Township and County Administration; 19th Century Ostrog County


Terms:
English
Russian
County
powiat; повіт or uezda; уѣзда
Township, Parish 
volost; волость
Village 
selo; село
Rural community
sel'ckoe obshchestvo; cельское общество
Peasant householder
krest'yan-domokhozyaev; крестьян-домохозяев
Social estate, class
soslovie; сословие
Village assembly
silskyi skhod; cельский сход
Village mayor              
silskyi starosta; сельский cтароста
Township assembly 
volostnoi skhod; волостной сход
Township headman
volostnoi starshina; волостной старшина
Township Board
volost pravleniya; волостного правления
Township Court
volostnoi sud; волостной суд
Township Court judges
sud'i volostnogo suda; судьи волостного суда
Tax collector
sborshchikov podatey; сборщиков податей
County congress
uezdnyi sezd; уездный съезд
District Marshal of the Nobility
uezdnyi predvoditel' dvoryanstva; уездный предводитель дворянства                                         
Provincial Marshal of the Nobility
gubernskyi predvoditel' dvoryanstva; губернский предводитель дворянства
Magistrate’s Court
mirovoi sud; мировой суд
Police Captain
ispravnik; исправник
Police Bailiff
stanovoi pristav; становой пристав
Police Constable
politseyskyi uriadnik; полицейский урядник
Police Precinct
stana; стана



In 1906, Ostrog County was made up of 14 townships with an average of 27 villages each.  The administrative system set up by the Tsar’s government allowed for a certain measure of self government within these townships and villages.  The provincial governmental (Volyn Gubernia) capital was located in Zhytomyr and was headed by a Governor or a Governor-General who was appointed by the Tsar himself. 

Each of the 12 counties of Volyn Gubernia was divided into a number of townships.  And of course each of these townships contained many villages or rural communities.  The local administration began at this village level. 

Each village had a mayor and an administrative body.  The administrative body was made up of delegates of the village, 2 for every 10 peasant households.  The assembly elected a mayor who would serve a term of 3 years.  In Right-Bank Ukraine (Ukraine territories west of the Dnieper River), the mayor and the assembly together formed the Hromada (Ukr: Громада, community) which was the administrative body for the village. 

Each township was similarly administered.  A township body was comprised of delegates from the villages of the township; 1 for every 10 peasant households.  This assembly elected the township headman who likewise was elected for a 3 year term.  Together with each village mayor and with any township tax collector(s), the volost headman formed the township board which was the executive body of the assembly.  Also members of the township assembly were any existent township court judges.  This township assembly elected one delegate to represent the township at the State Dumas (imperial assembly) in St. Petersburg.  In Right-Bank Ukraine, the township headman was required to be ethnically Russian or Ukrainian.

These administrative bodies had various duties for the well-being of the townships and villages.  The township assembly provided guidance regarding the economic and political course of the township, as well as giving direction for school systems and charitable foundations and hearing complaints that affected the entire township.  The township assembly also maintained any township employees.  For instance, many Volhynian townships employed a forester to maintain the cleanliness of the forests; leaves, pine needles and other natural refuse needed to be systematically removed to reduce the possibility of forest fires. 

The village assembly and hromada acted upon matters such as the use and allocation of village communal land, residence status of members of the community, as well as the management of any communal property or stockpiles, and the equitable distribution of the collective tax burden.  The hromada also maintained any village employees.  For instance, my great grandfather, Andreas Ratzlaff, was employed by the Village of Leeleva as the schoolteacher and also perhaps as the summer herdsman.  According to Abe J Unruh, villages also employed runners; teenage boys who could quickly run to the next village to communicate any important news or warn of any emergencies.  The hromada, due to its limited authority, largely oversaw community solidarity and managed village communal interests through control of social behavior.

The village mayor oversaw items such as chairing assembly meetings, supervision over peasant householders’ payment of taxes and fees, monitoring proper maintanence of roads and bridges within the village, detention of runaways or vagrants, managing emergencies and providing for public safety, management of crime scenes until police arrived, and generally taking necessary measures to provide for the proper decorum and order of the village.  Abe J Unruh relates that the village mayor in the Karolswalde Villages had the right to detain any stranger who appeared in a village such as a boy who might arrive without the proper escort of his parents.  Strangers such as these could even be chained to logs until their business in the village was sorted out.
 
The township headman had similar duties but his focus encompassed the entire township.  Headmen also ensured peasants were upholding their soslovie duties, oversaw decisions of the township court and village, issued residence permits for the township, managed each village mayor, as well as managing any township assets.  The headman had the authority to fine peasants up to 1 ruble, arrest them for periods not exceeding 2 days, and to order them to perform work on behalf of the township.

Township headmen, village mayors, as well as members of any township or village assembly, were probably fairly well-to-do rural peasants.  Up to this level of administration, no members of the nobility were included.  This system was practiced only in rural areas as a method of self-administration for the peasants; administration in urban areas was set up differently.  Of course, this system as it’s been described was all in theory.  What was realistically practiced on a day to day basis throughout the countryside could have varied significantly.

The German villages (Ger: Dörfer) in Ostrog County probably had their own mayors, who they would have called their Schultze or Schultheiß (German for mayor).  And they similarly would have enjoyed levels of self-government according to their specific soslovie.  They may have enjoyed some special exemptions from the township assembly, however, insofar as issues such as schooling of children and military service/taxation were concerned.

Above the township assembly was the district or county congress which was made up of the members of the county circuit court, municipal judges and justices of the peace, as well as the police captain.  This body was chaired by the District Marshal of the Nobility who was essentially the headman of the county.  The District Marshal was a nobleman, 21 years of age or older, elected to his post by the members of the county congress.  The District Marshal was the first appearance of a nobleman within the administration of the rural peasants.  Above the District Marshall, but not directly in charge of him, was the Provincial Marshal of the Nobility who worked with the Governor or Governor General in overseeing the administration of the entire province.

The judicial system for the county began at the lowest level with Parish Court.  The Parish Court consisted of several judges who had been elected to 3 year terms by members of village assembly.  Usually these judges had no judicial training and often meted out justice based upon local customs instead of imperial law.  Frequently, these courts introduced additional problems because they were untrained, biased and inconsistent.  This court’s jurisdiction was limited to rural areas and the Parish Court had no equivalent in urban areas.  The cases heard by this judicial body’s were limited to minor offenses between peasants or propery disputes at the lowest village levels.

The township board also held some judicial authority in minor matters between peasants.  Other local courts included the Magistrate’s Court, the Municipal Court, the County Court, and the Provincial Court.

Regarding legal enforcement at the local level, there existed a police force separate and apart from any local administration.  Counties were divided into 2 or 3 precincts.  Each precinct was under the authority of a bailiff and separate portions of each precinct were manned by police constables.  All the precincts in one county were under the authority of the aforementioned police captain who was also a member of the district congress.  The police captain was appointed by the provincial government and was under the direct authority of the Provincial Ministry of the Interior and the Provincial Court

Bailiffs and constables had the authority to conduct investigations in the support of charges in criminal cases as well as protecting the general public order.  Police had relatively high physical and intellectual standards and needed to be able to draw up reports and have a basic knowledge of the law of the Empire.  Above and beyond simple law enforcement, police were charged with monitoring any incidence or action that was contrary to the Tsar.  Murmuring against the government, administrative authorities or public order was indeed looked upon as a crime in 19th Century Imperial Russia.

The captain was theoretically elected by the local nobility for a period of 3 years.  In reality, he may have been appointed by the governor himself.  After the District Marshal of the Nobility, the police captain was the highest ranking official in any county.  The captain was also a member of the county congress.

In 1906 there were 3 police precints in Ostrog County.  The first served the northwest townships of Annopolskaya, Bugrinskaya, Dolzhanskaya, Goschskaya, and Siyanetskaya.  The second served the central and northwestern townships of Krivinskaya, Khorovskaya, Kunevskoy (where my ancestors lived), and Zdolbitskaya.  The office for this second precinct may have been housed in the village of Kunev.  The third precinct served the southern townships of Lyakhovetsky, Pereroslovsk, Pluzhanskoy, Semenovskaya, and Unievskaya.  Here's the stamp/signature of the police Bailiff of precinct #2, Ostrog County, from 1895:

This is the stamp/signature of the police Bailiff of precinct #2, Ostrog County, from 1906:


In most provinces throughout the empire, the mid 19th Century saw the introduction of the Zemstvo system in which local nobility, along with peasants, burghers and clergy took charge in matters of local governance in an effort to streamline and “russify” the populace.  In areas where the Zemstvo system was actice, the Zemstvo boss held considerable authority.  In Right-Bank Ukraine, however, the Zemstvo system was not fully implemented until the second decade of the 20th Century as this system placed heavy responsibility upon the local nobility.  In Right-Bank Ukraine, the majority of the nobility was of Polish origin.  Obviously the Tsar’s government did not want to place in the hands of Polish nobility the Zemstvo goal of “russification” thus more time was taken in these areas before the Zemstvo implementation.

History of Ukraine: The Land and its Peoples, by Paul Robert Magocsi

Features and Figures out of the Past, by Vladimir Iosifovic Gurko; 1939

The Helpless Poles, by Abe J Unruh; 1973

The Great Soviet Encyclopedia, 3rd Edition (1970-1979).  2010 The Gale Group, Inc.





Monday, March 11, 2013

Jacob Ratzlaff Family Residences


The Jacob Ratzlaff family, upon arrival in the United States in the Summer of 1893, lived in several locations in Marion County, Kansas.  Jacob probably never owned his own land in Kansas, but rather rented parcels of land.  Based on notes, census information, and family tree information, this is a rough timeline of Jacob's locations in Kansas and Oklahoma from 1893 until his death in 1926.
West portion of Marion County, Kansas, 1921

June, 1893: Jacob Ratzlaff family arrive in US.
1900: Jacob and family live in  Logan Township, Marion County, KS (1900 US federal census).
1905: Jacob and family live in  Moore Township, Marion Co (1905 KS census).
1910Jacob and family live in Moore Township (1910 US federal census; census includes Charles Nachtigal, son of Eva (Ratzlaff) Nachtigal.  Eva and family had arrived in US in 1909).
  •  At some point during this period, the family lived in Liberty Township (NW corner of section 7), Marion, Co (John Wiebe)**
  •  Jacob and family moved to outskirts of the town of Durham, Durham Park Township, Marion Co (Wiebe).  Perhaps son John still lived with them at this point as he did not marry until 1915 (GRANDMA).
1912: Anna dies, buried at  Logan Cemetery (AKA Morningstar; SE corner of Section 13, Logan TWP), north of  Durham (Green Ratzlaff book).
1912: Andreas Becker (husband of Lena) dies in Meno, Major County, OK (GRANDMA). Lena remarries to Bernard Becker in 1913 (these 2 Becker husbands were not closely related).
1920: Jacob lives with Eva's family in  Meno Township, Major Co, OK (1920 US federal census).

Major County, Oklahoma, 1928
  •  Beckers move to Scott City, KS, then to Halstead, KS, sometime in the early 1920s (GRANDMA).
 December, 1926: Jacob dies in Halstead, KS (Green Ratzlaff book).

**Notes from John Wiebe, grandson of Lena (Ratzlaff) Becker, indicate that Jacob rented land from a man named Pete Flaming at this point.  1921 PLAT map indicates that a Peter Flaming owned the SE quarter of section 12, Menno TWP.  Secton 12, Menno TWP and Section 7, Liberty TWP are next to one another.  Perhaps Flaming also owned land in Section 7 for a short period of time, or Wiebe was off just a bit with where he remembered Jacob lived.  Notes from Wiebe also indicate that Jacob associated with the Gnadenau Church/Village south of Hillsboro during this period in Liberty TWP.  This extinct village existed in the center of Section 17, Liberty TWP.    The family lived in the Pioneer Adobe House (Pioneer Adobe Museum, Hillsboro).  This house was moved onto the museum grounds in Hillsboro from the village of Gnadenau.

Wednesday, March 6, 2013

Climate Differences between Volhynia and Central Kansas


My Ratzlaff ancestors had many adjustments to make upon their arrival in the United States, not least of which was adjustment to the climate of central Kansas. 

Volhynia lies farther north than Kansas; Ostrog is at latitude 50.33 North, while Newton, KS is at 38.04 North.  This is a difference of more than 800 miles.  Ostrog is at a latitude similar to Winnipeg, Manitoba (Canada).  While Volhynia and Kansas both are land-locked areas experiencing continental climates, there exist large differences in the two area’s climates.  Climate in Kansas is characterized by large seasonal temperature differences, severe summer thunderstorms, and steady southerly winds.  Volhynia on the other hand experiences lower levels of termperature variation from season to season, greater distribution of rainfall and highly variable, light breezes (in comparison to Kansas).

Temperatures in Volhynia are, on the average, about 10 degrees cooler than central Kansas.  In February in Ostrog, a typical day’s low is 17 degrees (Fahrenheit) with a high of 27 degrees.  In July, an Ostrog day’s low is typically 59 with a high around 79.  Central Kansas’ averages are somewhat higher.  A January day will see 21 for a low and 40 for a high, while a July day will see 71 for a low and 93 for a high.  Record highs in central Kansas are well over 110 degrees while record highs in Volhynia are only in the 90s.  Record low temperatures for the two areas are actually quite similar although lower temperatures are experienced for a longer time period in Volhynia.

Wind in central Kansas is well documented; Wichita, KS may actually be windier than the “Windy City” of Chicago, IL.  Wind in Kansas is dominated by southerly winds that average 10-14 miles per hour throughout spring and summer.  Northerly winds in Kansas are experienced at times, usually in fall and winter.  Wind direction in Ostrog is distributed much more evenly, with westerly winds at 5-9 mph being the most common.  Wind in Ostrog, however, is much more likely to be light and from any direction. 

Ostrog sees more snowfall than does central Kansas.  Ostrog is likely to have snow on the ground from November through March whereas snow rarely lasts that long in Kansas.  Central Kansas gets most of its moisture from thunderstorms that occur in the spring and summer, some of which can be severe.  Ostrog sees relatively few thunderstorms.  Furthermore, while Volhynia may see the occasional tornado, central Kansas (in the heart of “tornado alley”) experiences literally dozens of tornados every year.  Overall, central Kansas receives more precipitation over the course of the year and is relatively more humid.  Ostrog will see an annual average of 23.5 inches of precipitation while central Kansas will receive almost 40 inches.  Volhynia, however, will have many more days with precipitation than will Kansas.  Volhynia’s precipitation will be spread over 168 days whereas Kansas’ will be spread over just 89 days.  This also points to the fact that central Kansas is a very sunny area; Wichita, KS, will receive more than 220 days per year of sun, while Volhynia will receive far fewer.  Summer days in Kansas can be muggy with a very high dew point whereas in Volhynia these muggy conditions are less frequent.

Daylight in Volhynia is different from Kansas since it’s at a more northerly latitude.  Daylight during a Volhynian summer day will last from 5am until 9:30pm, whereas in Kansas that same day will only last from 6am until 9pm.  In winter, however, the shortest Volhynian daylight will last from 9am until just 5pm whereas in Kansas that same day will last from 8am until 5pm.

In short, the Kansas climate is hotter, wetter and windier than Volhynia.  Kansas gets it precipitation in short, severe bursts and its days are dominated by sunny skies.  Volhynia experiences light, variable breezes, with mild precipitation distributed over longer periods of time.  Extremely long days and a lower dew point and humidity level make for pleasant summertimes in Volhynia.  My Ratzlaff ancestors arriving in Kansas, would have had to adjust to the severe thunderstorms and tornados of the spring and summer and probably would have missed the lower temperatures and long summer days of Volhynia.  On the other hand, they may have enjoyed the shorter winters and higher number of sunny days in central Kansas.







Tuesday, March 5, 2013

Slavuta Missile Base


In 1959 the USSR established the 615th Guards Engineer Regiment, based just outside of Slavuta.  Slavuta is a town about 15 miles east of Ostrog.  In the 19th Century, Slavuta was one of the larger towns in the Ostrog area and may have been well known to my Ratzlaff ancestors as well as the other Mennonites living in the German villages of the Karolswalde Circuit.  In 1960, the regiment was renamed the 615th Guards Missile Regiment and became attached to the 37th Guards Missile Division based in Lutsk, Volhynia (60 miles to the NW of Ostrog), itself a division of the 43rd Red Banner Missile Army.  The 43rd was an army of the Soviet Strategic Rocket Forces which controlled the USSR’s land based inter-continental ballistic missiles (ICBMs).


The 615th consisted of two battalions, each with 4 R-12 (SS-4) pads.  The first battalion went on alert duty in 1961 and the second in 1964.  Both battalions were stood down in February of 1984.  Alternate sources indicate that the 615th was equipped with R-5M missiles (instead of R-12 missiles).  The Slavuta site appears to have been the third location in the Soviet Union to be equipped with nuclear missiles and the R-5M was the first Soviet missile to be armed with a nuclear warhead.  From 1960-1984, NATO designated these launch sites as the“Ostrog MRBM (medium range ballistic missile) Complex”, with launch sites 1 and 2.  Two alternative launch sites were set up at Slavuta and Shepetovka (25 miles to the SE).

In 1985, the 615th went on alert duty equipped with 9 RSD-10 Pioneer-UTTKh (known to NATO as SS-20) missiles.    In 1988, the USSR deployed 405 RSD-10 missiles throughout the country, including those manned by the 615th.  This regiment was stood down in 1991 and disbanded.  In 2005, a paper published by the Bonn International Center for Conversion regarding ex-Soviet weapons housed at Ukrainian sites, claimed that there were still 20,000 tons of ammunition kept at the Slavuta sites.


These sites, located in the Ostrog Forest, are in positions that were in or very near Ostrog Powiat in the 19th Century.  The first site sat just northeast of Bilotyn, and the second between Khorovytsia and Komyny.  In addition to these two sites, additional barracks and a railroad depot were located on the southwest side of the town of Slavuta.

The ruins of these sites can be seen today on Google satellite views.  At the first site, remains can be seen of workshops, barracks, mess-halls, stores, parade grounds, a gym, a firehouse, and a shooting range, as well as numerous warehouses.  At the second site, similarly, ruins of barracks, warehouses, and hangars can be seen.  

For more information see:






Thursday, February 21, 2013

19th Century Ostrozhsky Volosti


During the 19th Century, Volhynia (Volyn Guberniya - Волинська Губернія) was divided administratively into 12 counties or Powiati.   The county or Powiat in which my Ratzlaff ancestors lived and probably did most of their dealings was Ostrog County or Ostrozhsky (Острозький).  Ostrozhsky was located in central Volyn and its administrative center was the town of Ostrog.  The county covered an area of about 2,694 square miles (or about 4,064 square versts, the unit of measurement used in Volyn at the time).  Ostrozhsky was bordered by Rіvnensky (Rivne) on the north, Іzyaslavsky (Zaslavsky) (Izyaslav; Zaslav) on the east, Starokostyantinіvsky (Starokostyantin) on the south, Kremenetsky (Kremenets) to the southwest, and Dubensky (Dubno) to the northwest.  Ostrozhsky also shared a border with Novograd-Volinskiy (Novograd-Volyn) for just a verst or two to the northeast.  (Interestingly, the combined area of McPherson, Harvey and Marion Counties in Kansas is 2,592 square miles, or just about 100 square miles less than Ostrozhsky). 

At this point I’m unclear as to the travel restrictions that may have been placed on the German colonists in Ostrozhsky by the Russian government.  Most peasant sosloviia had restricted travel priveleges and my German ancestors may have been similarly restricted.  It’s possible that they did not have the right to travel outside the county.  More research needs to be completed regarding this point.

The borders of Ostrozhsky were very irregular, following streams, roads, or topography.  The county was very roughly triangular shaped; wide at the north and culminating in one single village in the south.  From its northwestern-most point at Pyatigorov (P'yatyhory) to its northeasternmost point at Kilikiev (Kylykyiv) is a distance of about 40 miles (just over 59 versts).  From Pyatigorov to the southernmost point at the village of Turovka (Turivka) is a distance of about 47 miles.  And from Turovka back to Kilikiev in the northeast is about 52 miles.
Ostrog, located near the center of this rough triangle, was the administrative center of the Powiat, which was divided into 14 townships or parishes called Volosti in Russian.  Each volost had an administrative center; a chief village which was the namesake for its volost.  These are the 14 Volosti of Ostrozhsky in 1906:

An interesting note here is that these volosti may have changed from time to time.  Unofficially, these are the 14 volosti that existed in 1906.  At other times during the 19th Century, the villages of Moschanitsa, Borisov (Borysiv), Novomalyn and Tudorow (Fedorivka) may also have been volost centers.  After 1921’s Polish-Soviet War, Ostrog County was cut in half with Ostrog lying just on the Polish side of the border.  The administrative center of Polish Ostrog County was then moved northwest to Zdolbunovo (Zdolbuniv).  The half of Ostrog County on the Soviet side of the border was transferred to Zaslav County in the USSR

Most of the German Mennonite colonies lay inside the borders of Kunevskoy and Pluzhanskoy  with the exception of Moschanitsa which was in Siyantsy parish.  When my Great Grandfather Andreas Ratzlaff returned home after his forestry service, he reported to the Ostrog Police office and his discharge paperwork indicates his residence as Kunev parish.  The Ratzlaff family also lived in Leeleva, which was in Pluzhnoe parish.  However, Andreas’ 1906 passport was issued in Kunev even though the family lived in Leeleva.

In 1906, the Volyn Gubernia Statistics Committee in Zhytomyr published a list of all the settlements in Ostrozhsky.  This unofficial list indicates that there were a total of 379 settlements in the county, with a total population of 164,700 people.  This statistical compilation listed every settlement, down to those with only one household.  Most of the villages in Ostrozhsky in 1906 were very small; only two of them (not counting Ostrog itself which was populated by around 13,000 – 15,000 perople) had a population greater than 5,000 people: Zdolbunovo and Lyahovtsy (known today as Bilohiria).  The central post and telegraph station was located in Ostrog, with satellite offices in Goshcha, Kunev and Annopol.  Other nearby stations were in Zaslav, Slavuta, and Shepetovka in Zaslav County, Koretz in Novograd Volyn County, Rivne in Rivne County and Yampil in Kremenets County.  These are the populations of the volost towns in 1906:
Although most of the Mennonites living in Ostrozhsky had emigrated prior to 1906, many Germans still lived in county.  This chart shows the populations of the German villages in 1906.  Many of these may have been Lutheran Germans.
The statisticians compiling this data listed these villages by their Ukrainian names, not their German ones, therefore Karolswalde is listed as Sloboda Galendry.  Interestingly, two listed villages may be the Leeleva (Feurstendorf) where my family lived.  Listed among the villages of Pluzhanskoy, we find both Lesnaya and Leleva, but I’m not sure which of these was actually the German Mennonite settlement of Fuerstendorf.  One of these may actually be the village of Khoten II (Khoten Druhyi also known as or Balyary).  This village lies less than a mile east of Leeleva but is not listed elsewhere in the 1906 report.  On the other hand, I suspect Leeleva became a Lutheran German village after the emigration of the Mennonites.  Could it be possible that Leeleva in 1906 was divided - one half being Lutheran and the other being Mennonite - thus Lesnaya and Leleva?

Missing entirely from the 1906 compilation, however, was the Mennonite village of Karolsberge.  Karolsberge appears on many maps from the 19th Century, and is also included in Mennonite lists of Volhynian villages.  On a Polish map from the 1920s, Karolsberge appears to have been merged with Karolswalde.  Did this consolidation occur as early as 1906?

The complete 1906 report can be found here.

Wednesday, February 13, 2013

Weekend Z Mennonitami, Chrystkowo

I want to thank my friend Wojciech Marchlewski for informing me about an event coming up this spring near Przchowka, Poland.  This is an annual event celebrating Mennonite heritage in the village of Chrystkowo, which is a couple miles south of Przechowka.  In the 17-18th Centuries, the Mennonite villagers at Chrystkowo were associated with the Przechowka congregation and some of my Ratzlaff ancestors may have lived in this very village.  This is an event sponsored by a group with which Wojciech is associated - the Friendship of the Lower Vistula.  More information and photos of past year's events can be found here and here.  This year's event will take place June 14-16.  If anyone has interest in attending the event, please contact me and I can put you in contact with Wojciech so you can find out more information.

Friday, February 8, 2013

Ukraine and Volhynia in early 20th Century Russian Empire


I recently came across a series of articles regarding early 20th Century Ukraine in the Russian Empire.  Unfortunately, I can’t find the name of the author or editor, or any publication information for these texts.  They appear to be written in the very early 20th Century – probably the 1910s – by a Ukrainian author.  Below, I’ve summarized and consolidated the articles and picked out information specific to Volhynia.  Some of this information probably isn’t entirely accurate, and since I can’t verify the author or his sources, there may be items below that aren’t altogether true.  What these articles do give, however, is a sense of what Ukraine may have been like around the turn of the 20th Century.  The author is obviously Ukrainian and with the words he uses, he shows again and again the differences between the Ukrainian and Russian cultures.  From my early 21st Century American vantage point, it’s difficult to understand that there was indeed a major cultural difference between Ukraine and Russia, and the Russians were definitely seen as an occupying force in Ukraine at this time.  I think most Americans probably view Ukraine as part of Russia (or the Soviet Union), but that’s definitely a mindset that we need to move away from and the author of these articles helps us understand why.  The series of articles can be found here.  Terms in italics are in Ukrainian, not Russian.  I’ve included some information regarding the Taurian Gubernia since the Molotschna Mennonite settlement was located in that province.

Boundaries

The ethnographic border of Ukraine (України) is difficult to definitively delineate since Ukraine has historically been divided among other eastern European countries.  In the early 20th Century, however, most of Ukraine was under the control of the Russian Empire (Російської імперії), with the major exception of Galicia (Галичина), which was controlled by Austria-Hungary (Австро-Угорщина). 

Ukrainians traditionally occupied the frontier areas along the 19th Century borders of Austria- Hungary and Bukovina (Буковина) and constituted a majority of the population in Austrian Galicia.  In Russia (Росія), Ukrainians occupied southern areas of Kholm Gubernia (Холмська губернія) and Poland (Warsaw Gubernia at this time, Варшавська губернія).  Bessarabskaya Gubernia’s (Бессарабська губернія) northwestern tip and coastal region were also traditional Ukrainian territory.  Ukrainians also made up a minority of the population in the Grodno Gubernia (Гродненська губернія) and Minsk Gubernia (Мінська губернія).  Volyn Gubernia (Волинська губернія), Kiev Gubernia (Київська губернія), Podolia Gubernia (Подільська губернія), and Kherson Gubernia (Херсонська губернія) made up traditional Right Bank Ukraine (Правобережна Україна).

Left Bank Ukraine (Лівобережна Україна) included a minority of the population in the Kursk Gubernia (Курська губернія) and Voronezh Gubernia (Воронізька губернія), as well as the Don Cossack Oblast (Область Війська Донського) and Kuban Oblast (Кубанська область).  Ukrainians accounted for a majority of the population in the Taurian Gubernia (Таврійська губернія), Katerynoslav Gubernia (Катеринославська губернія) (Taurian, with Katerynoslav, Kherson and Bessarabskaya constituted New Russia), Kharkiv Gubernia (Харківська губернія), Poltava Gubernia (Полтавська губернія), and Chernigov Gubernia (Чернігівська губернія) (Kharkiv, Poltava and Chernigov made up traditional Left Bank Ukraine).  Finally, Ukrainians occupied frontier areas of Stavropol Gubernia (Ставропольська губернія), Terek Oblast (Терська область) and the Black Sea Gubernia (Чорноморська губернія) in the east. 
  
History

Although Ukraine’s history is closely linked with the histories of Poland (Польщі) and Russia, Ukrainian history remains distinct and separate from these two major eastern European powers.  Formed around the City of Kyiv (Київ), Ukraine (Kieven Rus, Київська Русь) was the major power of the eastern Slavic states from the 9th to the 13th Centuries.  At this time, due in part to its proximity to Constantinople (Константинополь), Kyiv was a city grander than most of Western Europe.  Galich (Галич) in Volhynia (Волинь) was also a major power center during this time.  In the 10th Century, Vladimir the Great, Grand Prince of Kiev, accepted Greek Christianity.  By the 13th Century, Ukraine (Kievan Rus) vied with Muscovy (Grand Duchy of Moscow, Велике князівство Московське) for power among the Slavic states, but was eventually destroyed by the Tatar (Mongol) invasions led by Genghis Khan and his successors.  Incorporated into Poland in 1340, Ukraine was still raided by Tatars while the Polish overlords treated the native Ukrainians as conquered peoples.  In 1569 Ukraine was formally joined to Poland (the First Polish Republic also known as the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth, Річ Посполита).  The Ukrainian Cossacks (Козацтво) developed warrior customs to protect the people against the Tatars, but the Poles saw this militarism as a threat.  Cossack uprisings took place in the 16th and 17th Centuries.  In 1648, Boghdan Khmelnitski led the Cossacks against the Poles and briefly created an independent Ukrainian State.  But in 1654, pressured by Russia, Ukraine accepted the suzerainty of the Tsar in exchange for nominal autonomy.  Immediately, Russia began to repress the Ukrainians.  By 1667 Russia and Poland divided Ukraine into the Left Bank (east of the Dnieper River, Дніпро) and the Right Bank (west of the Dnieper River).  The Right Bank was given over to Poland, and Russia maintained control of the Left Bank.  After the Partitions of Poland in the late 18th Century, Right Bank Ukraine was returned to Russia.  At this point, the entirety of Ukraine, save a small portion of Galicia that was under Austrian control, became territory of the Russian Empire.

After this point, the Russians closed Ukrainian schools, outlawed Ukrainian literature, and the Ukrainian Orthodox church was removed from the Patriarch of Constantinople’s authority and placed under the jurisdiction of the Patriarch of Moscow (Москва).  Any followers of the Polish Uniate faith in the formerly Polish-controlled Right Bank were suppressed.  Traditionally, the Ukrainian people have wanted to follow the path of democracy, but Russia (Muscovy) always followed the path of an absolute monarchy.

This history of repeated periods of oppression and occupation severely hindered the growth of Ukrainian culture throughout the centuries.  While it’s true that Ukraine naturally has commonalities with other Slavic States such as Russia and Poland, (for instance, Russia and Ukraine share the Orthodox religion), the Ukrainian people have always had unique and separate cultural identities from these two major Slavic powers.  As a result of the oppression and occupation, Ukrainian cultural growth was always limited and a traditional animosity has developed between the Ukrainians and Poles and between the Ukrainians and Russians.    
  
Geography

The borders of Right Bank Ukraine were the same in the 19th Century as they had been for centuries, but the Left Bank had changed dramatically.  Much territory had been taken from the Ottoman Empire (Османська імперія) and added by the Russians in the south and east such as the Crimean Penninsula (Кримський півострів) and New Russia (Новоросія). 

Ukraine was always hard to defend as it has few natural borders.  The country is reasonable flat aside from the rise of the Carpathians in the west.  To the east, Ukraine is open to advances of raiders from Asia, and the Black Sea (Чорне море) gave Turks access to the south.  The only natural boundary Ukraine has are the Carpathians Mountains in the west, but the European powers have never had reason to pressure Ukraine militarily (until the 20th Century).  In contrast, Russia has the Ural Mountains as a natural boundary to the east and the arctic as a boundary to the north.  Even so, Ukraine’s culture is reasonably homogenous throughout. 

The entire southwest 3/4 of Ukraine is black-earth country, to be highly prized for agriculture.  Since the ground was so fertile, farmers never needed to develop progressive agricultural methods.  Only in western Ukraine, in Volhynia, Podolia (Поділля) and Galicia, do bogs and hills arise, creating hardship for farmers.  In these territories the earth is not as fertile and the terrain is not as flat.

Culture

Culturally, Ukraine lagged behind both Poland and Russia from early days due to the Mongol oppression in the 13th Century.  But Ukrainians did develop their own culture, separate and unique from Polish or Russian culture. 

Typical Ukrainian villages and homes are surrounded by orchards and the front windows of Ukrainian homes face south.  Ukrainians also build their houses farther apart than do the Russians, as a precaution against the spread of fire.  Ukrainian houses are whitewashed and clean and have separate compartments for animals and people, in contrast to Russian houses where people and animals inhabit the same space.  Traditionally, Ukrainian houses and buildings were made of clay and wood rather than stone.  Stone buildings would have proved more durable, but clay and wood were always more abundant. 

Ukrainian national costumes are distinctly different from Russian native dress.  Also, relative to the Russians, Ukrainian women are much more powerful in society insofar as their roles in the family and community are measured.  Generally speaking, Ukrainians and Russians did not inter-marry and rarely lived in the same village as one another. 

Ukrainians may seem lazy and indifferent to an outsider, but this was due to the Ukrainians’ individualistic nature and philosophic outlook on life.  On the other hand, perhaps Ukrainians had become apathetic as a result of centuries of repression.  Ukrainians for centuries put up with the Tatar raids, destroying their villages and burning their crops.  A casual attitude developed; why build it up when the Tatars will just knock it down again?  A Ukrainian was fundamentally cheerful, but not prone to gaiety, rather melancholy and quiet.  The Ukrainian was more domestic, frugal, and temperate than his Russian counterpart.  And a Ukrainian could not accept common ownership of land as a Russian could, because the Ukrainian is, by nature, democratic and individualistic. 

Ukrainians are also different physically from Poles and Russians.  Ukrainians are typically taller and have darker features and hair, and are built with broader shoulders and stronger chests.  Poles and Russians, on the other hand, have fairer complexions, and are shorter and less heavy.  Other cultures may have believed Ukrainians to be Russified Poles or Polonized Russians or even Mongolized Slavs.  However, Ukrainians may actually be more closely related to the Adriatic Slavs; the Czechs, Serbs, Slovenes and Croats.

The Ukrainian language remains distinct from Russian and Polish and the Ukrainians have their own folk songs and fairy tales.  Nor is the Ukrainian language a vulgar language not to be used for formal business (as Low German was, in comparison to High German).

Ukraine has always been overlooked by history; Russia has always treated Ukraine as part of Russia, but this is not accurate (Russians have termed Ukraine as “Little Russia”).  The Ukrainians always resisted Russification or Polonization, but the Ukrainian upper class always adopted either Russian or Polish ways, leaving only the peasants to develop Ukrainian culture.

Historically, Ukraine has always been isolated from the centers of European Culture such as Paris or Rome or even Berlin, Vienna, or Prague (save for Constantinople in the very early days).  The Carpathian Mountains have long provided a natural boundary between Ukraine and Europe.  As a result, Ukraine has had even less European influence than has Russia.

By the early 20th Century, after more than 100 years of Russian rule, educated Ukrainians had become Russified.  The Russian Empire required all official business to be conducted with the Russian language.  The Russians also required that the Russian language be used in schools during 19th Century.  Based on their disdain for the Russian language, many Ukrainians therefore avoided school, further stunting any cultural growth.  This language barrier created tremendous hardship on the Ukrainian peasants who had adapted more easily to the Polish language and the result was that the general populace was fairly illiterate (literacy in Volyn in the early 19th Century stood somewhere around 17% while in the western provinces such as Taurian, Kherson and Katerynoslav it was somewhat higher).

In the 19th Century, both educated and uneducated Ukrainians clearly resented Russian authority and looked upon their Russian oppressors with contempt.  Russification gradually took hold among the populace, but generally the Ukrainians disliked the Russians even more than they had disliked the earlier Polish overlords.

As a result of this cultural backwardness, most Ukrainians lived in rural villages and did not migrate into cities which only exacerbated their backwardness.  By the very early 20th Century, cities in Volyn were populated by foreigners and Jews while the native Volhynians (Ukrainians) lived on the land.  City dwellers, engaging in trade and industry, tended to need a higher level of education than did those who farmed the land.  Ukrainian natives living in rural areas added to their cultural backwardness by remaining without education and not engaging in industry.

Agriculture

By the 20th Century, the typical Ukrainian farmer lagged behind his European counterpart who had developed innovative technology and advanced methods to aid production.  For centuries, the Ukrainian black earth farmer was spoiled by the high level of fertility of his land and did not develop his farming methods.  For instance, the Ukrainian farmer did not rotate his crops, did not use new implements or technology, and because of his illiteracy did not have the ability to find out about new agricultural methods.  Ukrainian agriculture tended to be more advanced near the Polish border and in the areas of German colonization.  Wooden plows were still used, although iron plows and other implements were making inroads by the early 20th Century.  German colonists in the Ukraine used more iron implements and the natives in those regions tried to imitate them.  However, the Russian government hindered the spread of agricultural associations and co-ops that might also have helped increase the general level of agricultural efficiency. 

Only the northwest areas of Ukraine were totally settled by the early 20th Century.  Volyn, in fact, was fairly densely populated, but was also fairly heavily forested.  13% of Ukraine was forested around the year 1900, but the percentage in Volyn was more on the order of 30%.  The west had very little forest; for instance Katerynoslav was only abouty 2.5% forested, Kherson about 1.5% and Taurian slightly less than 6%.  Deforestation in the west, however, was occurring at an alarming rate.  In Russian Ukraine in by the late 19th Century, more than 86% of the population was engaged in agriculture. 

The Ukrainian peasants owned only a small percentage of the land at this time.  In Volyn, peasants owned about 40% of the land by the turn of the 20th Century.  The ever increasing peasant population required more and more land, but a full 60% of the countryside was owned by the nobility.  As a result, the peasants had to split up their land and try to rent new parcels from the nobles.  Russian forms of community ownership of land had also begun to take hold in eastern Ukraine by the end of the 1800s. 

By the early 1900s, 53% of Ukraine was under cultivation (only 37% in Volyn as opposed to 64% in Taurian).  Wheat covered about 50% of Taurian, Katerynoslav and Kherson, but only about 11% of Volyn.  Wheat was one of Ukraine’s chief chief exports at the time.  Rye was heavily cultivated in Volyn and covered about 38% of that province (rye covered only 18% in Taurian).  Barley covered almost 0% of land in Volyn, but 26% in Taurian.  Volhynians also raised a small percentage of oats and buckwheat.  Volhynians were beginning to raise a lot of sugar beets by the late 1800s and Taurian had begun heavy tobacco production.  Czechs colonists living in Volyn also raised a lot of hops. 

Ukrainians from early times had also developed a fruit culture; the country was dotted with many fruit orchards and each household probably had a fruit tree or two.  In Volyn, many apples, pears and cherries were grown.  Large peach, apricot, plum, apple, pear, and cherry orchards were cultivated in Taurian while many grape vineyards were kept in the south near Melitopol (Мелітополь). 

Bee-keeping was also popular in the west and Volyn had approximately 206,000 hives kept.  The silkworm culture had begun to take hold in the southern provinces; the German Mennonites of Taurian Province became experts at sericulture, the practice of breeding silkworms for silk production.
 
Many Ukrainian farmers also occupied themselves with animal husbandry.  In Volyn in the early 20th Century, for every 100 people, there were 19 horses, 32 steers, 18 sheep, and 17 hogs.  Likewise in Taurian for every 100 people, there were 30 horses, 28 steers, 61 sheep, and 11 hogs.  In Volyn, cattle-raising, horse-raising and dairying were fairly light.  Sheep and goat-raising were also light, but hog-raising was abundant.  Indeed, across the whole of Ukraine, the hog was perhaps the most important source of husbandry-based income for agriculturalists.  Asses and mules were seen only in the southeast while in Taurian an occasional camel could even be seen.  Poultry-raising was also very important in Volyn, but most poultry was exported out of the country.  In Volyn, almost all farmers kept some animals, but less than 1% of farmers relied on husbandry alone without raising any crops.

Industry and commerce

In Ukraine, specifically in Volyn, most people in the early 20th Century engaged in agriculture or cottage industry of some sort.  Home industries in Volyn in the early 20th Century were in decline as factory industries were gradually taking hold, but the rise of industry was only in its infancy in this time period as Ukrainian peasants continued to provide for most of their own needs regarding manufactured goods through home industry.  Those who did not have land enough to sustain agriculture relied on household industry for income.  Others produced goods to supplement their agricultural income.

Weaving was the most important home industry in Ukraine and still by the early 20th Century almost every home had a loom.  Furthermore, every Ukrainian peasant knew the wood-working trade, Volhynians included, and the home pottery industry was also still very important.

Wood-carving, textile and pottery production however, were gradually being taken over by manufactories in larger towns.  The factory industry in Ukraine was largely run by foreigners (Russians, Germans, French) and Jews.  Textiles, wool, mineral products, and food industries all were moving toward professional manufactories by the early 1900s.  Only a very small number, perhaps less than 5%, of Ukrainians were involved in industrial pursuits or were employed by manufactories during this time. 

Commerce in Ukraine was in the hands of foreigners (Russians, Jews, Greeks, Germans, etc), because of the low level of education among Ukrainians and generally poor communication and travel systems in Eastern Europe.  Austrian Galicia was much more advanced since the Austrians were more progressive than the Russians (Austria had taken over a small portion of Ukraine, known as Galicia, after the Partitions of Poland). 

Commercially, the fair system (a holdover from medieval times, in contrast to the mercantile system that had largely been adopted by this time in Western Europe) was still prevalent in the 1800s in Ukraine.  Fairs gave wholesalers opportunity to sell to retailers.  Wholesalers traveled throughout the country trading with peasants.  They would then take their goods to a fair to sell their goods to retailers.  Many, many fairs were held in Ukraine in the larger cities and villages.  In Volyn, the town of Dubno (Дубно) was well-known for its large annual fair.  In the larger Ukraine, Kyiv, Berdichev (Бердичів) and Kharkiv (Харків) all held major fairs.  Even international traders sometimes attended the larger fairs.  Specific wool and grain fairs were held in areas where these items were exported (namely New Russia). 

The commerce of the wider world was only beginning to touch Ukraine in early 1900s by which time the area had begun to export wool, cattle, poultry, grains, and raw minerals.  On the other hand, Ukraine imports included mainly manufactured goods. 

In Volyn, some iron ore was produced as well as a fair amount of lumber.  The lumber industry (saw-mills) remained important along the Pripyat (Прип'ять) River in Volyn although overall this industry was under-utilized at the time.  Only small portions of the total population were engaged in the lumber industry.  Volhynia had large deposits of peat due to the boggy, swampy areas and was also rich in kaolin clay (used to make porcelain), sandstone, chalk and graphite.

The cities and towns of Volyn were largely inhabited by Jews and seemed dirty and neglected.  Brody (Броди), on the border of Austrian Galicia, did considerable agricultural business and remained a center for smuggling due to its frontier location.  Luck (Луцьк), Dubno and Rivne (Рівне) formed the Volhynian triangle of forts against old Austria and were important trading towns.  Rivne traded grain, alcohol and livestock.  Radivilov (Радивилів), across the Austrian border from Brody, was a den of smugglers.  Ostrog (Острог) lay at the point where the Gorin (Горинь) River became navigable and nearby Netishin (Нетішин‎) was an important local port for goods from farther south.  Ostrog had long been regarded as an important spiritual center of Volhynia.  Ostrog and nearby Zaslav (Заслав) engaged in a small amount of grain trading and Korec (Корець), to the northeast, was famous for its clay and manufacture of porcelain.

In southern province of Taurian, Melitopol (Мелітополь) traded large amounts of grain, lumber, wool, cattle, and egg,s and had large mills and factories producing agricultural equipment.  Likewise, Berdyansk (Бердянськ) exported grain and had machine factories, mills, breweries, fruit gardens and vineyards, but limited accessibility due to its poor harbor.  Higher tariffs were placed on goods going to Black Sea ports such as Odessa (Одеса) however, therefore it was easier to ship goods via rail to the Baltic or Moscow than to Odessa, Melitopol, or other Black Sea ports. 

Ukraine’s exports went first to Russia and then were exported internationally.  Likewise, imports came into Russian cities from abroad, but very few found their way into isolated Ukraine.  Ukraine itself had a severely negative trade balance and saw little profit from any exports.  As a result of poor transportation, communication and trade practices forced upon them by the Russians, Ukrainian economy was stagnant and the culture remained undeveloped; virtually untouched by the outside world.

Transportation and Communication

The condition of roads throughout Ukraine was very poor.  Most roads were unpaved and may have simply been strips of deep mud in all seasons but summer.  In a lot of the country, secondary roads were simply bridle-paths, passable by foot or by bridle horse but not by wagon or vehicle of any kind.  From early days, stone had not been used as a material for road building, thus contributing to the poor nature of Ukrainian roads.

Some important southern and eastern cities such as Katerynoslav and Kherson had no paved roads leading into them at all.  By the early 1900s, paved roads in Ukraine were rare.  In Volyn there were only one or two paved roads in the entire province; these being the highways crossing the country east to west. 

The railroads were built by the Russians in the 19th Century to allow southern access to Moscow or to the Baltic ports, but not to connect cities for basic transportation.  For instance, in the 19th Century there was no direct connection between Ukraine’s two chief cities, Kyiv and Odessa 275 miles apart, but both were directly connected to Moscow, almost 500 miles to the north from Kyiv.  Lemberg (L’viv, Львів), ethnographically a Ukrainian city, was the biggest rail hub in the Ukrainian world, but it lay in Austrian Galicia, not in Russian Ukraine.  Lemberg in the early 20th Century was the closest thing to a rail hub in the European sense anywhere near Ukraine. 

The railroads had been mapped out by the Russians and bypassed many important Ukrainian cities and no real rail hubs existed.  Some junctions ended up in the middle of nowhere because all rail lines ultimately led to Russian destinations such as Moscow or St. Petersburg (Санкт-Петербург).  Cities that did not have a rail line declined in importance.  For instance, the City of Machnowka (Mahnivka, Махнівка, known as Komsomolskoye, Комсомольське, since 1935), on the border of the Volyn and Kiev Gubernias, had been an important town and was marked prominently on early 19th Century maps.  However, the Russian-built railway passed through nearby Berdichev and the importance of Machnowka declined rapidly throughout the 1800s.

Communication was also inhibited by the similar carelessness with which the borders of Ukraine had been drawn; both within Russian Ukraine, as well as the international border with Austria.  These borders had been drawn with no regard for natural or ethnographic conditions.  For instance, Lemberg, the most important communication center for western Ukraine, lay in Austrian controlled Galicia since the Partitions of Poland, and could not easily be accessed by Russian Ukrainians.  These shortcomings regarding communication and transportation severely impaired the growth of the economy and culture in Russian Ukraine in the 19th Century. 

Finally, the City of Odessa, in Kherson Gubernia, was the biggest Black Sea port and the City of Kherson was the most important Dneiper River port.  Odessa was surpassed only by St. Petersburg (on the Baltic Sea in the north) in importance as a port city throughout the Russian Empire.  Melitopol, Mariupol and Taganrog (Таганрог) were other important Black Sea ports and Sevastopol, on the Crimean peninsula, was the home of the Russian Naval Black Sea Fleet.  Overall however, Ukrainian water bound trade was far under-utilized by the early 20th Century.